I guess that is CS 36 Traditional, not tall mast

 

  _____  

From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of andrew
rothweiler
Sent: January 10, 2014 8:29 PM
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Stus-List Comparing boats for purchase

 

Hello All,

Requesting some advice about interpreting data/stats on 2 boats I'm
considering for purchase.  Having a boat that has the traveler and genoa
winches easy to reach from behind the helm is a key factor for me so that
control/single handing will be easier.

Also, I'm using PHRF numbers to help determine which boat might be more
competitive in  club races.

So the two boats are a C&C 35-2 and a CS 36T.

 

The stats I'm using are from the PHRF site and SailboataData.com:  (don't
know how this chart will come out on the forum)

 

                                                      LOA  LWL  B         D
SA         DISP      SA/DISP   DISP/LWL   FORE/MAIN SAIL AREAS

 

C&C 35-2  PHRF 123-139-126    35'     30.77  10.58   5.58   629sf    13,800
17.56         224.34          352.5/276.75

 

CS    36T   PHRF 123-135-126    36.5   29.92  11.5     6.35   640sf
15,500      16.53          258.34         367.5/272.53

 

My main question is how can the CS36 have a nearly identical PHRF to the C&C
when the CS 1) weighs almost 2,000lbs more and 2) doesn't compensate for the
weight with a lot more sail area, the total sail areas being almost the
same?

What other factors must be considered in understanding why a similar size
boat with almost the same waterline and sail area but weighs a ton more has
the same PHRF? What am I missing?   Which of the two boats would do better
in club races and around the marks?

 

Thanks in advance for your help in understanding this.

 

 

 

  _____  

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2247 / Virus Database: 3658/6491 - Release Date: 01/10/14

_______________________________________________
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
CnC-List@cnc-list.com

Reply via email to