To Jim and all C & C 38 owners... See below from the "wise old C &C designer"
David F. Risch 1981 40-2 (401) 419-4650 (cell) From: r...@edsonintl.com To: davidrisc...@msn.com Subject: RE: Stus-List C&C 38 mk1 vs mk2 Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 08:24:58 -0400 I can’t figure out what 38 Mark 1 and Mark 2 are . . . . I’m getting old you know , . . . and I don’t have Jim’s e-mail address . . . The comments he makes don’t fit my impression of the two 38’s that I’m thinking of . . . To me the Mark one was an IOR One Ton hull made into a racer cruiser . . . The Mark Two was the first design I did entirely on the computer and it is/was wildly different from the Mark One, and it is the widest boat (for its’ size) that I ever did, so the comments don’t fit . . . The beam on Mark1 is 12.16 and the Mark 2 is 12.79 . . . So, there must be two versions of the original 38, that I’m forgetting, and a change of rudder and ballast is a realistic possibility – but the beam would be the same on both, and for sure the two keels cannot be that different. I show the ballast as being 5980 lb. for the Mark 1 . . . So – I’d like more details . . . . I am quite sure we did not build even a hundred of what I think of as the mark 2 . . . . Cheers, Rob Ball Chief Design EngineerEdson International Tel 508-995-9711 Fax 508-995-5021 Email: r...@edsonintl.comwww.edsonintl.com From: David [mailto:davidrisc...@msn.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 4:32 PM To: Rob Ball Subject: FW: Stus-List C&C 38 mk1 vs mk2 Rob, Forgive the last sentence but could you shed some light on the topic below. Thanks in advance. David F. Risch (401) 419-4650 (cell) > Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:23:57 -0700 > To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com > Subject: Re: Stus-List C&C 38 mk1 vs mk2 > From: cnc-list@cnc-list.com > > When I was buying my 38 Mk 2 (hull #132) recently, the prior owner told > me the difference between the mk1 and mk2 was a deeper rudder and more > keel ballast on the mk2. > He said those adjustments were made to try to provide better downwind > control in broachable conditions. > > Sailboatdata.com seems to at least partially back him up though their > numbers are confusing. They have the mk2 with 6800 lbs of ballast > compared to the mk1 with 4400. Yet they both are listed with > displacements of 14,700. The other difference they show is a slightly > beamier mk1. > > I agree that if the designs were even mildly different, the PHRFs would > likely reflect that and don't. So I probably just complicated this > search for Hoffa's remains but the subject has puzzled me as well, so > thought I'd throw in what I'd heard. > > I wish there was a wise old C&C designer on this list to resolve such > mysteries. > > Jim Lynch > > Alcyone > 1977 38-2 > Olympia, Wa > > > --- > This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus > protection is active. > http://www.avast.com > > > _______________________________________________ > This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album > > Email address: > CnC-List@cnc-list.com > To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go bottom of page > at: > http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com > Total Control PanelLoginTo: rob@edsonintl.comFrom: davidrisch75@msn.comRemove > this sender from my allow listYou received this message because the sender is > on your allow list.
_______________________________________________ This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album Email address: CnC-List@cnc-list.com To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go bottom of page at: http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com
