Developers arguing choice of license makes about as much sense as lawyers arguing choice of programming language. Until we are in a position to have real legal counsel, we should use the least restrictive, most permissive, most minimalist license possible so that we give ourselves maximum flexibility to adapt later on.
That would be New BSD. -Mark On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Ted Bullock <[email protected]> wrote: > On 18/05/2010 11:58 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> On 5/18/2010 12:55 PM, Ted Bullock wrote: >>> >>> For instance here is the ISC license, it is small, easy to understand, >>> and I never ever get confused about what my responsibilities are. >>> """ >>> Permission to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this software for any >>> purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above >>> copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies. >> """ >> >> Where are you granted use of applicable patents? > > You aren't then again I'm pretty sure there was patent language in the > codeplex agreement. > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
