On 5/18/2010 1:01 PM, Ted Bullock wrote: > On 18/05/2010 11:58 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> On 5/18/2010 12:55 PM, Ted Bullock wrote: >>> >>> For instance here is the ISC license, it is small, easy to understand, >>> and I never ever get confused about what my responsibilities are. >>> """ >>> Permission to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this software for any >>> purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above >>> copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies. >> """ >> >> Where are you granted use of applicable patents? > > You aren't then again I'm pretty sure there was patent language in the > codeplex agreement.
Precisely my point; no reciprocal patent license from the CPF for the resulting body of work? Now that sets all sorts of alarms. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
