> I'm still asking with legitimate interest, what conflict? Can you actually > cite either a lawyer or prominent OSS individual's research on this topic,
I meant within our community not in open source in general. It seems some want BSD others want APL. I personally don't care which however I figured I should mention such an idea as an alternative so that everyone is happy. On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:03 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. <[email protected]> wrote: > On 5/18/2010 9:54 PM, Andrew Fenn wrote: >> Since there is a conflict between APL 2.0 and BSD how about a >> compromise. We could use the BSD license and attach a patent clause to >> it. > > Hmmm? > > I'm still asking with legitimate interest, what conflict? Can you actually > cite either a lawyer or prominent OSS individual's research on this topic, > other than Theo? I'm asking both because I'm not fond of technical nor legal > FUD, and because if there is a problem with the AL I'd like to point it out > to the relevant lawyers for when its revisited again. > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
