>> I am looking for a way to find the corresponding function body without >> specifying a function name literal or an identifier meta-variable here. > I have told you, several times I think, that 1) there is none,
Thanks for this clarification. I would appreciate if this detail can possibly be improved because I am just interested to find all function bodies which contain open issues in the sense of static source code analysis. > and 2) there is no need for one. We have got different opinions about this implementation detail. >>> A patch normally contains the name of the enclosing function on the line >>> with the line number information. [...] > This statement suggests that you have never actually used Coccinelle, if > you don't know what it outputs. I have just tried to clarify if you really moved from a semantic patch to the conversion result (of your tool) in your wording. Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci (Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only)
