I think that all you want is the ability to specify a function like;
\(foo\|xxx\|yyy\)(...) {
I stumbled across the inability to use alternatives for function names
in exact this example pretty early. So...
[...]
...at least I do want that feature, yes. :)

Your wish was fulfilled with the software release "Coccinelle 0.2.5-rc5".
This improvement makes it easier and a bit more convenient to filter on a list with identifier alternatives.

Does anybody know a completely documented list of functions that belong to an "application" programming interface like the Linux kernel? Are you interested to convert this documentation into a filter pattern that combines the known function names with checks for failure predicates?

Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci
(Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only)

Reply via email to