> except that 4 of the 5 ORs are cases where we want to do the -return ret; + > return ret; So I suppose for performance, I should actually add the +/- to > each of the 4 cases that we want cocci to generate a patch for?
Actually, it's probably not that big a deal. It's only rewriting the ones where there is a return ret just before, not all the returns in the code, like I was originally thinking. julia _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci (Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only)
