On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 05:35:47PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > > except that 4 of the 5 ORs are cases where we want to do the -return ret; + > > return ret; So I suppose for performance, I should actually add the +/- to > > each of the 4 cases that we want cocci to generate a patch for? > > Actually, it's probably not that big a deal. It's only rewriting the ones > where there is a return ret just before, not all the returns in the code, > like I was originally thinking.
Ok :) I'll update the patch one last time - hopefully we've got everything nailed down now :) thanks for being so incredibly helpful! Greg > > julia > _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci (Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only)
