>> How are the chances to get the filter pattern to work which was created with >> an >> alternation of 893 function names? > > I have already stated that this is not a priority.
I can understand that. > First, it is not a reasonable use of Cocinelle. I find this feedback strange. Static source code analysis on Linux files can result in higher and interesting numbers for further consideration of corresponding transformations. > Second, the problem is likely not in Coccinelle but in the regular expression > library > that is being used. Which source code places are affected by this software development challenge? Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
