On Tue, 15 Apr 2014, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > >> How are the chances to get the filter pattern to work which was created > >> with an > >> alternation of 893 function names? > > > > I have already stated that this is not a priority. > > I can understand that. > > > > First, it is not a reasonable use of Cocinelle. > > I find this feedback strange. > > Static source code analysis on Linux files can result in higher and > interesting > numbers for further consideration of corresponding transformations.
Yu should use virtual identifiers, not huge regular expressions. > > Second, the problem is likely not in Coccinelle but in the regular > > expression library > > that is being used. > > Which source code places are affected by this software development challenge? I have no idea. It is the PCRE library. julia _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
