On Sat, 26 Sep 2015, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > To collect function calls that have a return value of a given type t,
> > it should be sufficient to do the following:
> >
> > @@
> > t e;
> > identifier f;
> > @@
> >
> > f(...)@e
>
> Is such a SmPL approach better than a variant like the following?
>
> @find_function@
> type t;
> identifier f;
> @@
> t f(...)
> { ... }
Your approach finds a function definition. My approach works on the call
directly, using whatever type information is available.
julia
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
