On Sat, 26 Sep 2015, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > >> * Will a command-line parameter like "--include-headers-for-types" > >> be needed here? > > > > This argument is never needed. It is only an optimization. It means that > > he header files are only considered when collecting type information, but > > not whn doing transformation. But this argument has no effect on the set > > of types tha are available. > > I would consider the reuse of the parameter "--recursive-includes" then > so that the most function signatures will be available. > This has got some consequences on the execution speed and configuration > for the source code analysis. > > Are there any risks to include too many functions?
Maybe if there are conflicting definitions of the function with different return types. This is probably not a big deal in practice. julia _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
