> * There is now support for conjunctions ( & ... & ). As for a > disjunction, the () and & should be in column 0. A conjunction requires > two patterns to match against a given piece of code in a consistent way.
When will corresponding descriptions appear also in the manual? How does this software extension differ in the handling of several changes in patch scripts together without using an ampersand? Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
