On Sun, 18 Dec 2016, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Without having the semantic patch and the .c file, ideally with both
> > cut down to a minimal version that shows the problem,
> > I can't answer this question.
>
> Can you generally clarify current consequences from usage of a SmPL rule
> “initialize:…”
> together with the parameter “--jobs” for the program “spatch”?
It should happen only once. Thus without your semantic patch and your .c
file, I can't tell why it doesn't behave as expected.
julia
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
