> The source code analysis results look promising by this command. I have just noticed that an other source file points details out for further development considerations around the mentioned functionality from the Coccinelle software.
elfring@Sonne:~/Projekte/Linux/next-patched> git checkout next-20170803 && spatch.opt ~/Projekte/Coccinelle/janitor/show_same_statements1.cocci sound/pci/rme9652/hdspm.c … (ONCE) already tagged but only removed, so safe diff = … @@ -6497,9 +6497,6 @@ static int snd_hdspm_create_alsa_devices i = 0; while (i < hdspm->midiPorts) { err = snd_hdspm_create_midi(card, hdspm, i); - if (err < 0) { - return err; - } i++; } @@ -6955,10 +6952,6 @@ static int snd_hdspm_probe(struct pci_de hdspm->pci = pci; err = snd_hdspm_create(card, hdspm); - if (err < 0) { - snd_card_free(card); - return err; - } if (hdspm->io_type != MADIface) { snprintf(card->shortname, sizeof(card->shortname), "%s_%x", … Now I am looking for a way to express the constraint that the statement list metavariable should match only source code with two statements at least. Can the search for duplicated source code be improved by the means of the semantic patch language? Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci