> Why do you want to remove the semicolon? I have shown a transformation example where a function parameter should be replaced by a previous function call. Thus a semicolon should be intentionally be deleted.
> If you want to find the call somewhere in the next statement, you can say > > ( > S > & > call( > ... > ) > ) > > where S is a statement metavariable. This SmPL specification variant can be also interesting. I got just interested in the possibility to omit an extra semicolon in my simple change approach. Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
