On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Geoff Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 3) If this is already known, is there a customary pattern for avoiding the > problem? "Never release from observeValueForKeyPath" is a bit harsh! I don't know if it's known, but you could try [obj performSelector:@selector(release) withObject:nil afterDelay:0] instead of [obj release] if you don't mind getting the extraneous observeValueForKeyPath:... for that obj (it could have an "about to be released" flag which would cause it to ignore the observeValueForKeyPath:...) Hamish _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
