On Jun 11, 2008, at 12:29 AM, Jim Puls wrote:
For that matter, it may be worth pointing out John's confusion between "sloppy" and "incorrect". He makes a decent point that returning a mutable object when the method definition specifies an immutable one is sloppy and, indeed, fraught with peril.
Do you feel the same way about passing a (char *) to a method that takes a (const char *)?
I think that it's perfectly reasonable to expect the receiver of the piece of data, or object, that you hand over to respect the basic restrictions of that type.
j o a r _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
