On Jun 24, 2015, at 4:09 PM, Rick Mann <rm...@latencyzero.com> wrote: > > I guess I disagree: it's obvious in most cases. Again, I'm just arguing for > the OPTION. You can always choose to use the parameter name if you wish.
You have the option. Given this signature: func foo(intArg: Int, stringArg: String) -> Bool { ... } add this code to call the function without named arguments. func foo(intArg: Int, _ stringArg: String) -> Bool { return foo(intArg, stringArg: stringArg) } Now you can call it either way. I like that I do NOT have the ability to mix and match calling conventions by accident which could possibly confuse code readers. Especially when I am the code reader! If I really need the the option to do mix styles adding code such as that above wouldn’t be an issue. Marc _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com