Maybe file a bug to see if it's expected. 
But at first glance it seems clear to be ambiguous scope. it can't figure out 
that the first {} is part of the condition rather than the thing triggered by 
the condition. 

A do while knows more easily because the {} after do is what is conditionally 
executed. 

Honestly it starts to look Perly with that much crammed in either way. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Aug 19, 2015, at 3:04 PM, Antonio Nunes <devli...@sintraworks.com> wrote:
> 
> In Swift 2.0 I can write this:
> 
>        repeat {
>           …
>        } while reminder.exclusions.filter { $0.spansTime(t) }.count > 0
> 
> but I can’t write this:
> 
>                if reminder.exclusions.filter { $0.spansTime(t) }.count > 0 {
>                    …
>                }
> 
> which gives an error about consecutive statements on a line needing a “;”
> 
> If have to write this:
> 
>                if (reminder.exclusions.filter { $0.spansTime(t) }.count > 0) {
>                    …
>                }
> 
> 
> Any ideas why?
> 
> -António
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
> 
> Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
> Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
> 
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/dangerwillrobinsondanger%40gmail.com
> 
> This email sent to dangerwillrobinsondan...@gmail.com

_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to