Looks like you are getting the track for nothing. Try changing [track get];
to track = [track get]; or you will just be querying the reference for gapless. F. On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Peter Stirling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > '=' and '==' are equivalent in predicate format strings (predicates are > queries, so assignment isn't possible) > > I should probably have made clear in the first post: > > The program returns a list of all tracks that are marked as gapless from my > mp3 collection (and only those marked gapless), the problem is that those > objects all say that the tracks aren't gapless. > > On 1 Sep 2008, at 1:24 am, Tommy Nordgren wrote: > >> >> On 31 aug 2008, at 03.12, Peter Stirling wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've been trying to do some python scripting of iTunes using pyobjc and >>> ScriptingBridge, and I've been having some problems (I reduced everything to >>> objective-c on its own in order work out if it was caused by pyobjc). >>> >>> According to: >>> >>> >>> http://developer.apple.com/releasenotes/scriptingautomation/RN-ScriptingBridge/index.html >>> >>> running: >>> sdef /Applications/iTunes.app/ | sdp -f h --basename iTunes >>> >>> should generate an objective-c header file which you can use in >>> conjunction with [SBApplication >>> applicationWithBundleIdentifier:@"com.apple.iTunes"] >>> (which it does). >>> >>> An excerpt from the file I generated (included in the zip file): >>> >>> @interface iTunesTrack : iTunesItem >>> ... >>> @property BOOL gapless; // is this track from a gapless album? >>> ... >>> @end >>> >>> So there should be an accessor method on iTunesTrack objects called >>> gapless that returns a BOOL. >>> >>> [track respondsToSelector:@selector(gapless)] returns YES >>> >>> However it doesn't seem to work, the code provided in the zip archive >>> (when executed on my machine), produces a list of all the gapless tracks in >>> my mp3 collection, but every line ALSO claims that the track is 'not >>> gapless'. >>> >>> (The original python code that I was using seemed to get different >>> answers depending on ordering of operations, including calling the accessor >>> twice in a row on the same object giving different answers). >>> >>> Am I doing something wrong? The other accessors that I call appear to >>> return the right data, though I've not done exhaustive testing. >>> >>> (As a background to what I'm doing, I want my iTunes playlists random >>> except for gapless cds, which I want to be seamless, the shuffle provided by >>> itunes can't make that distinction for itself). >>> >>> >>> <tester.zip> >> >> From test.m : >> NSPredicate* predicate = [NSPredicate >> predicateWithFormat:@"gapless=YES"]; >> >> this should probably be : ..... predicateWithFormat:@"gapless==YES"]; >> ----------------------------------- >> See the amazing new SF reel: Invasion of the man eating cucumbers from >> outer space. >> On congratulations for a fantastic parody, the producer replies : "What >> parody?" >> >> Tommy Nordgren >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) > > Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. > Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com > > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/slasktrattenator%40gmail.com > > This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
