Just to clarify:
They probably are identical, but not in the way everyone seems to be
assuming.
To make sure I don't misrepresent anything, I'll just quote the rule:
"You take ownership of an object if you create it using a method whose
name begins with "alloc" or "new" or contains "copy" (for example,
alloc, newObject, or mutableCopy), or if you send it a retain message."
Nothing in that rule says or implies that objects you get through
other methods are autoreleased.
I did a quick test and found that [[[NSString alloc] init]
autorelease] and [NSString string] return the SAME instance. Thus,
they are probably optimized to return a constant empty string, as
there is no reason to have multiple instances of an empty string
taking up memory in an app.
Now, I agree that it is mostly paranoia, but it is simply incorrect to
say that any object you send autorelease to, or get through a method
"whose name [DOES NOT] begins with "alloc" or "new" or contains
"copy"" will be sent release in the next run loop.
I'll offer a more practical example. NSWorkspace is documented to be a
singleton, and +sharedWorkspace returns "*the* NSWorkspace object
associated with the process," i.e., there will always be a single
instance on NSWorkspace available that will never be deallocated
(except by the OS when the process terminates).
Thus, I sometimes see code that declares an instance variable
"workspace," assigns it to [NSWorkspace sharedWorkspace] in an init
method, then just uses it wherever, never bothering to retain it or
anything.
While I think that's a pretty stupid way to save a little bit of
typing, the documentation makes it clear that there is nothing wrong
with doing that, because this instance will not disappear.
However, I think it *would* be a bad idea to call [[[NSWorkspace
sharedWorkspace]retain]autorelease]
A good singleton will override -retain, -release, and -autorelease to
do nothing and return an appropriate value. But since you know it's a
singleton (through appropriate documentation), you really shouldn't be
doing any memory management with it.
Adam Leonard
On Nov 20, 2008, at 5:12AM, Alexander Spohr wrote:
Just to clarify:
Am 19.11.2008 um 23:43 schrieb Joseph Crawford:
NSString blah = [[[NSString alloc] init] autorelease]
is identical to
NSString blah = [NSString string];
atze
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/adam%40caffeinatedcocoa.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
