On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Martijn van Exel <mve...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi devs, > > I can't seem to get away with > if(timer!=nil && [timer isValid]) [timer invalidate]; > if the timer object does not exist. > I'm not used to the second operator of the && even being evaluated if the > first one evaluates false (Java, .NET). This is not the case in (Obj)C?
No, just as in C (and C++, when operator overloading isn't involved), the second operand to the && operator is never evaluated if the first evaluates to zero. What, exactly, is going wrong? -- Clark S. Cox III clarkc...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
