On Oct 10, 2010, at 5:10 AM, Jerry Krinock wrote: > In deciding how to solve the problem, I'd like to know how gcc solved the > problem! It seems there are three choices: > > (1) Wrap my non-atomic custom setter/getter code to make it atomic. > (2) Change my declaration to make it nonatomic. > (3) Somehow ignore the rule and compile the code as I wrote it. > > Which did gcc do?
GCC ignored the problem and happily generated code that wasn't atomic. b.bum _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
