On Aug 3, 2011, at 8:10 PM, Andy Lee wrote:
> On Aug 3, 2011, at 9:51 PM, Graham Cox wrote:
>> I think the point they wanted to get across was that they didn't want to see
>> code like this:
>>
>> if( someFunction() && someOtherFunction()){ ... }
>>
>> instead of:
>>
>> if( someFunction())
>> {
>> if( someOtherFunction())
>> {
>> ....
>> }
>> }
>
>
> This I agree with. I "know"[1] about the short-circuiting behavior of && and
> still I'd prefer the conditional flow be super-clear rather than have to
> think about operator rules even a tiny bit. But now we're back where we
> started.
I find short-circuit evaluation easier to read and much more concise, and, of
course, it's always nice to avoid unnecessary levels of nesting.
Preston_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
