On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 13:23:25 -0500, Charles Srstka said: >1. Apple reserves the underscore prefix for their own use, so you could, >at least theoretically, clash with a superclass ivar this way, and
In addition to what Kyle replied, I'd just like to point out that prefixing your *methods* with an underscore is a very bad idea, since Apple does reserve such names and a conflict will bite you at runtime possibly affecting the binary compatibility of your app. IMHO, prefixing your ivars with underscore is a good idea because it's typical convention. A conflict has never happened to me, and would mostly be a compile-time problem. But your point about KVO is a good one! Has anyone been bit by it? -- ____________________________________________________________ Sean McBride, B. Eng s...@rogue-research.com Rogue Research www.rogue-research.com Mac Software Developer Montréal, Québec, Canada _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
