Unfortunately, if the doc doesn’t mention it specifically, don’t assume that it is and always will be, even with evidence. You can check the headers to see (and if there is a mismatch, mention it in a bug)
File a bug asking for clarification. which you have. This goes for all hopefully-KVO compliant properties. Sending a bug that says please document all KVO-compliant properties isn’t necessary (or really helpful) because that’s in progress as we come across them. But on a per class basis, if you’re not sure about a property, go and file the bug. And a single bug for multiple properties in a class is fine, so Kyle didn’t need to knock himself out. :-) But thanks for filing. Scott On Dec 2, 2011, at 2:30 PM, Kyle Sluder wrote: > The NSViewController documentation and header file do not mention if > NSViewController is KVO-compliant for its view property. The docs > mention that it is KVO-compliant for title and representedObject, and > the headerdoc comments mention KVO-compliance for representedObject > but not for title. > > Can anyone on this list give a definitive answer to the KVO-compliance > of NSViewController.view? I've already filed rdar://problem/10497897 > and rdar://problem/10498295 about view and title respectively. _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
