Okay, I've learned why it has to be this way, but it sure doesn't seem right to me, especially when it's evident from the code (in this case) which constructor to call.
-- Rick On Jan 18, 2013, at 1:28 , Rick Mann <rm...@latencyzero.com> wrote: > Can anyone explain this error? It sure looks to me like all the base class > constructors are being explicitly called. > > http://pastebin.com/cVMmgqCZ > > > $ clang Test.cpp > Test.cpp:40:5: error: constructor for 'E' must explicitly initialize the base > class 'C' which does not have a default constructor > E(const std::string& inS, B* inB) > ^ > Test.cpp:12:7: note: 'C' declared here > class C > ^ > 1 error generated. > > Thanks! > > -- > Rick > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) > > Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. > Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com > > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/rmann%40latencyzero.com > > This email sent to rm...@latencyzero.com -- Rick _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
