On Feb 6, 2013, at 10:29 PM, Chris Hanson wrote: > On Feb 4, 2013, at 11:26 AM, Seth Willits <sli...@araelium.com> wrote: > >> Looking around the open source code for exec(), it appears EINVAL (22) can >> be returned if the task was exec()'d when not called from a vfork()'d >> process, with the comment /* If we're not in vfork, don't permit a >> mutithreaded task to exec */ which seems to line up with the *** >> multi-threaded process forked *** line in the crash log… trouble is I have >> no idea what this ultimately means to me. Seems like an OS bug? > > One thing that occurs to me is that there might be something running that is > injecting itself into your app's address space - and into the address space > of the forked subprocess, and trying to do something "on startup." > > What loaded libraries are listed in the crash dump?
Nothing third party that I can see. https://gist.github.com/anonymous/4732383/ On Feb 7, 2013, at 3:40 AM, Ivan Ostres wrote: > On 2/4/13 8:26 PM, Seth Willits wrote: >> [snip] >> Thread 0 Crashed:: Dispatch queue: com.apple.main-thread >> 0 com.apple.Foundation 0x978142d8 >> ___NEW_PROCESS_COULD_NOT_BE_EXECD___ + 7 >> 1 com.apple.Foundation 0x976d2e16 -[NSConcreteTask >> launchWithDictionary:] + 4698 >> 2 com.apple.Foundation 0x97744447 -[NSConcreteTask launch] + 40 >> [/snip] > Hi Seth, > > are you starting a shell script here or native binary? A native 32-bit binary. -- Seth Willits _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
