On Jul 26, 2013, at 8:36 AM, dangerwillrobinsondan...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On 2013/07/27, at 0:26, Scott Ribe <scott_r...@elevated-dev.com> wrote: > >> On Jul 26, 2013, at 8:13 AM, Steve Sisak <sgs-li...@codewell.com> wrote: >> >>> It's worth noting that's very energy inefficient. >>> >>> Once the WWDC sessions are back on line, watch >>> the energy efficiency sessions to see what's >>> happening with timers in Mavericks. > > Good point. Though this timer is pretty little and the app wouldn't be doing > a lot else. > But it stands to reason that it could be battery friendly to suspend it when > the app is not visible. And to offer a battery power pref to suspend when > it's not the front application.
Watch the WWDC videos. They explain why this isn't enough. --Kyle Sluder _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
