On Nov 22, 2014, at 12:43 AM, ChanMaxthon <m...@maxchan.info> wrote: > Given that Apple's Foundation does not support getting NSRunLoop from > CFRunLoopRef, Cocotron designed CFRunLoop using toll-free bridging from > NSRunLoop and GNUstep have a NSRunLoopFromCFRunLoop() (and GNUstep have some > some NSRunLoop extensions allowing implementing this mess without fussing > with CF.) function in their CoreFoundation implementation, is it safe to pass > whatever object I got from the underlying framework over to the upper layer, > with proper warning in the documentation?
It's not clear what you're asking. CFRunLoop and NSRunLoop are _not_ toll-free bridged. If some code is written to expect an NSRunLoop, it is not safe to pass it a CFRunLoop. If the class's methods (designed to be overridden by subclasses) are written to take a CFRunLoop, all of your problems go away. Why are you working so hard to avoid using CFRunLoop? Regards, Ken _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
