This looks really promising! Could you elaborate on what caused this major performance boost?
Thanks, Ovidiu On Wed, 30 Jan 2002 17:13:24 -0500, Berin Loritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I ran another round of load tests on Cocoon, and the results are much more >encouraging. > I noticed just how much quicker Cocoon was at rendering the Avalon site, so here are >my > numbers: > > URL > num requests max time min time > average > std-dev > http://localhost/cocoon/documents/index.html > 40.00 1,422.00 20.00 128.20 251.70 > http://localhost/cocoon/hello.html > 78.00 1,542.00 0 234.40 440.06 > http://localhost/cocoon/hello.svg > 73.00 701.00 0 41.56 92.15 > http://localhost/cocoon/hello.wrl > 73.00 851.00 0 52.70 132.17 > http://localhost/cocoon/i18n/simple.xsp > 41.00 1,722.00 40.00 263.02 392.57 > http://localhost/cocoon/moreover/moreover.xml > 61.00 113,033.00 12,708.00 38,660.79 21,067.11 > http://localhost/cocoon/slashdot/slashdot.xml > 68.00 23,013.00 391.00 9,100.29 7,168.80 > http://localhost/cocoon/welcome > 78.00 881.00 10.00 55.56 104.27 > http://localhost/cocoon/xsp/simple > 40.00 280.00 20.00 77.63 56.06 > TOTAL > 552.00 113,033.00 0 > 5,401.57 > 7,050.03 > TOTAL (minus remote) 423.00 1,722.00 0 > 12 > 1.87 154.28 > > > When you consider even the painfully slow pages like moreover.xml and slashdot.xml, >your average > number of > requests per second is only 11.11. > > However, when all resources are local, we have an average of 492.34 requests per >second. > > This is almost 400% improvement over about a week ago. > > > -- > > "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety > deserve neither liberty nor safety." > - Benjamin Franklin > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
