David Crossley wrote:
>
> Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> > Cocooners,
> >
> > We have to resolve licensing issues quickly. I committed as
> > many licenses as I could find, <snip/>
>
> A big thanks to Vadim for all your work with getting the
> various licences sorted out.
Yep. Kudos, dude.
> This is not a showstopper and may not even be an issue for us.
> However, i noticed that many of the licences have strange
> dates. Most of them say "1999" and only a couple of them say
> "2002".
We just include the licenses that they ship. This is not our problem.
> Also the main legal/LICENSE file has Ant replacement
> tag for @year@
Well, this is a little too far. We should change this to a valid year
(2002) seems reasonable)
> I do not know if these are issues and i definitely do not speak
> any legal-babble.
Dirk?
> Also, does the page xdocs/license.xml now need to say that
> there are other relevant licence files in the distribution, besides
> the main one that is shown there?
I would suggest so, yes.
--
Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be
able to give birth to a dancing star.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Friedrich Nietzsche
--------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
