On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Sylvain Wallez wrote: > giacomo wrote: > > >On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > > ><sniped/> > > > >>As for the last issue with view and aggregation, could some view-guru > >>explain exactly how are to be handled the different parts of an > >>aggregate with the different cases (no label, label on map:part and/or > >>map:generate). > >> > > > >There has been a thread on that weeks ago between Stefano and me. You'll > >have to look in the archives. > > > >Giacomo > > > Could you please confirm that views on aggregation is defined as follows ? > > <map:part> : > - if no view is requested, all parts are added, > - if the requested view corresponds to one of the labels of at least one > of the parts, only matching parts are added, > - if the requested view doesn't correspond to any of the labels of any > of the parts, all parts are added, just like when no view is requested. > > <map:aggregate> : > - acts like a generator, i.e. it reacts to its label and views > from-position="first", > - handling of an aggregate's label is independent from the labels of its > parts, i.e. it doesn't depend on whether some parts were filtered or not. > > This mainly on the third point for <map:part> (the view doesn't match > any label of any part) that I'd like confirmation.
Well, I have to dig into the sitemap.xsl and some other code to really see how I've implemented it (cannot remember by heart). Giacomo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
