Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>
> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>
> >Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> >
> >>Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> >>
> >>>But two minor things with your check-in:
> >>>a) Please add the licence header next time to the source when you check-in
> >>>
> >>Carsten, why is the full Apache license needed in each source file ? Did
> >>I miss something about this ?
> >>
> >Because otherwise our code is not legally protected from the current
> >Apache license.
> >
> >>This makes the mouse wheel roll and roll to go down to the code ;)
> >>
> >We are fully aware of this, the Apache Licensing Committee has been
> >working on an Apache License 2.0 which takes care of this and you can
> >simply place a placeholder instead of the full text (just like the GPL,
> >for example)
> >
> >But legal stuff is *way* slower than code around the ASF :)
> >
> DOM4J has an interesting solution : the full license (Apache-like) is
> placed at the bottom of each source file and at the top there's a simple
> header with a copyright notice and a "See the bottom of this file for
> the licence".
Uh, clever.
I'd be +0 on this if you want my vote.
--
Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be
able to give birth to a dancing star.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Friedrich Nietzsche
--------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
