On Wednesday, June 5, 2002, at 08:44 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>> >>> Though, if having so many formats is not contradictory to the >>> Forrest vision >>> then I am +1 for it. >> >> We could do a simple document consisting of a table, of course. >> Having a >> specific DTD however ensures we have a common information structure >> across all XML Apache sub-projects, which is part of the Forrest >> vision. >> > I think we should simply use the usual dtd. It available, can be used > immediatly and offers all possibilites we need. +1 Let's keep our eyes on the prize -- CONTENT. Steven, the problem being: all new dtds are supposed to work with document-v11. Doesn't that unnecessarily delay these kinds of documentation efforts? As you know, I'm struggling with similar issues with other dtds. I don't want to do *anything* to delay Forrest adoption, but we also need docs... Diana --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
