Steven Noels wrote: > > > From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > I think we should simply use the usual dtd. It available, can be used > > immediatly and offers all possibilites we need. > > I'm touchy about the validation thing AND the commonalities between > other projects: we need a common format & presentation across all > xml.apache.org projects, and I believe having a specific DTD for these > purposes can help. See > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=forrest-dev&m=102327343231312&w=2 for > Konstantin contradicting himself on that ;-)
In the long term a specific DTD might make sense, but I totally agree with Diana that now deciding for a DTD delays us too much. Let's use the usual DTD (and I can start right now...) and if we want we can later on switch to a specific one if everything is in place. > > > And what about the active developers and emeritus committers? I still > > believe a simple <s2 title="Active committers">, <s2 title="emeritus > > committers"> > > is sufficient. > > Have you seen the <category> elements? You could have as many categories > of contributors as you want, and you're free to name them to your > personal liking. > Ah, no, didn't see that (sorry, but I'm currently working with the left eye and watching soccer with the right one...) Carsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
