Klaus Bertram wrote:
> 
> Michael wrote:
> >Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> >>
> >> >It does also not help to call this xsp ones with small data amount
> >> >and the second time with large data amount (giving the amount as request value).
> >> >
> >> >I know the process ID (Linux) of the thread which stops the system.
> >> >Is there any way to know if this thread is the garbage collection thread?
> >> >
> >>
> >> Delay in small XSP can be explained as gc, but system hang-up... I
> >> doubt. StoreJanitor monitors memory state and logs everything to the log
> >> file - do you see any suspicious activity there? if not, it is not gc issue.
> >>
> >
> >Nothing suspicious in the logfile:
> >DEBUG   (2002-08-29) 16:23.49:350   [core.store.janitor] (Unknown-URI) 
>Unknown-thread/StoreJanitorImpl: JVM total Memory: 49377280
> >DEBUG   (2002-08-29) 16:23.49:351   [core.store.janitor] (Unknown-URI) 
>Unknown-thread/StoreJanitorImpl: JVM free Memory: 12260168
> >DEBUG   (2002-08-29) 16:23.49:351   [core.store.janitor] (Unknown-URI) 
>Unknown-thread/StoreJanitorImpl: Memory is low = false
> >
> >
> >Michael
> 
> Is your jdk is sun 1.3 ?
> they had with this problems by large memory and thread's Stand of jan 02

No, I have Sun 1.4.0_01
As I encountered this problem I got the latest available jdk.

Michael

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to