On 21.Oct.2002 -- 09:38 AM, Christian Haul wrote:
> On 20.Oct.2002 -- 11:44 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2002-10-20 at 20:40, Antonio Gallardo Rivera wrote:
> > > Thanks for your prompt request.
> > >
> > > I checked it. The build.sh recongnize my 1.4 VM. It select 1.4 JVM. But I
> > > think there is a problem inside the database-block. I think this is not a
> > > question about the java version of the compiler:
> >
> > I am pretty sure it is :)
> >
> > Have a look at the original source code:
> >
> >
>http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xml-cocoon2/src/blocks/databases/java/org/apache/cocoon/components/language/markup/xsp/EsqlConnection.java
> >
> > You will see the @JDBC3_START@ and @JDBC3_END@ markers. They are used by
> > the build system to uncomment the necessary implementations depending on
> > the JVM version. So I guess the transition into the database block broke
> > this mechanism.
> >
> > This needs to be fixed...
> >
> > So you have 4 options:
> > 1) you fix it (and provide a patch)
> > 2) you uncomment the code by yourself
> > 3) you use JDK 1.3
> > 4) wait for someone else to do it
>
> OK, looks like it's my fault, although my local repository does the
> commenting / uncommenting right (sun j2sdk 1.4.1 and blackdown
> 1.3.1_02FCS on debian linux). Must have missed a file during cvs
> update.... will look into this.
I did a fresh checkout and could not reproduce any problem related to
jdbc3 / jdk 1.4. Antonio, please delete your cvs snapshot and try
again with a fresh one.
Chris.
--
C h r i s t i a n H a u l
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
fingerprint: 99B0 1D9D 7919 644A 4837 7D73 FEF9 6856 335A 9E08
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
