Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > Steven Noels wrote: > > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > > > > 3) what does it mean for Cocoon? > > > > > > Being a project allows us to host several different incubation-stage > > > efforts underneath. Cocoblog, wyona, forrest, cocoon-related IDE > > > plugins could be possible additions. Of course, with the idea of > > > promoting them as top-level projects when they are successful from a > > > community perspective. > > > > > > Also, it means that we could have our own machine running the entire > > > cocoon.apache.org web site (that means: finally having Cocoon > > > serving its own pages!) > > > > > > Last but not least, it will give much more visibility to Cocoon since > > > it will be visible directly from www.apache.org > > > > Seems you hit the sweet spot pretty hard :-| > > > > OK. I won't be doing this all by myself. But I don't want to see > > something we have been preparing for such a long time willingly > > ignored by this proposal. > > NOTE for others: Steven called me on the phone to apologize for the tone > of this email. So, please, people, let's keep the tone of the > conversation constructive.
Steven's tone *was* constructive, the concern was correct, and there is no need to apologise. This concern would have been quickly addressed if we had discussed the top-level proposal before voting. Thanks Stefano for your comments below, which allay the fears. --David > I think I mixed concerns. > > One concern is moving cocoon higher up in the legal structure of the ASF. > > Another concern is what infrastructure will empower that. > > This proposal is about the first concern. It does *NOT* nor was intended > to contain a proposal for the second concern that will be dealt with > *after* the first is solved. > > So after this votation ends and all committers voted. <snip/> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
