Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > Enke, Michael wrote: > > >Cool. > >But two questions: > >1) can we configure if zip or gzip? > > > > Nope, this is zip only. Using gzip would mean producing a tar.gz. > > >2) wouldn't it be better to add zip/gzip functionallity to > > AbstractSerializer so that we have it for all? > > I thing that someone want to have html zipped ... > > > > Ah, I understand... the misunderstanding ;-) This serializer is not > about compressing the output, but about aggregating *several sources in > an archive*. The compression stuff is only an added benefit of the zip > format. > > There was a discussion back in July about sending gzipped html, but this > lead to the conclusion that this is the responsibility of the container > (httpd or Tomcat). See > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=102602879406360&w=2 for > more info.
Ah, yes, this thread was initiated originally from me but with no real result up to now ;-) Ok, I tried it and send a patch for caontainer based compression. Michael --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
