> > Minor point, but seeing as the cli uses the bean, surely the CLI > > environment should be replaced with a 'more generic' > > bean-environment, rather than there being one of each. > > Well, actually the CLI has an additional jar needed, the CLI jar (soon > switch as Avalon is doing to commons-cli).
Let me know when we're ready to do so, and I'll happily send in a patch to move to the commons-cli. > So I would not want to need to include that jar just for the "bean". > So I'd keep them still separate but with one dependent on another. Fair enough. Upayavira
