Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 17/3/03 20:15, "Stefano Mazzocchi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip/>
What about adding a 'content encoding' attribute to the 'pipeline' instead?
'transfer encoding' attribute would make sense, but content encoding...
wait wait wait
I'm using Pier's terminology here: for 'content encoding' I'm thinking about 'gzip' stuff, not 'UTF-8'.
Ah, Ok, my bad; encoding="gzip" is ok.
Vadim