On 30/3/03 14:43, "Stefano Mazzocchi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cocoon Object:
> [...]
> cocoon.process(uri, dict, output
There's another thing I don't really like (and being the implementor of the
feature, yes, it's my own fault)...
Currently to the "process" method we ought to pass a nice OutputStream
instance, which we can create using the Rhino extensions to acess Java
objects.
Now, I'd rather like to see it more "factored" out, a some sort of
"OutputStreamFactory", like we do for source files...
Anyone has some design hints on how we could achieve that? Anyone else sees
it as I do as a "design hack" ???
Pier (the culprit)
