On 1 Apr 2003 at 11:04, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > Christopher Oliver wrote: > > Yes it's quite odd. And to me it sounds like a bigger hack than > > passing an OutputStream. Source has a getInputStream() and > > represents a "source of data" according to its documentation. It > > doesn't even have getOutputStream(). > > WriteableSource does.
Small point: In 2.1 it is now ModifiableSource (Writable source is depracated). Upayavira
