Does it need a vote?
Joerg
Christopher Oliver wrote:
I agree with you that 2.1 should not be delayed for changes to FOM. That can come later.
Stephan Michels wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:AFAIK, the only real thing missing for 2.1 is the FOM implementation. The question is now, is someone already working on it resp. should we wait for the release until it's finished?
I think we should set a date now and take whatever we have for a beta
release. So I propose to make a beta 1 on the 24th of June. (Then if
required one more beta and then final with two or three weeks inbetween).
What do you think?
Sorry, but I'm currently very impatient. I don't want wait until some FOM or whatever is finished.
I'm for releasing as early as possible. This isn't funny any more :-/
Stephan.
