Gianugo Rabellino wrote: > Joerg Heinicke wrote: > > >> Hmmm, if this is the case, that even Forrest committers has to have this > >> kind of right. > > > > [RT] Why Forrest is not/does not become a subproject of Cocoon while > > it's so heavily based on it? > > Definitely something to consider, it makes a lot of sense.
It does make sense. The hiatus is because Forrest started before Cocoon even thought about sub-projects. Also Cocoon moved out of xml.apache.org to be a top-level project and left Forrest behind. --David
