About the Source vs Generator issue: I found a post by Sylvain [1]. It
does not separate the Source and Generator concepts completely but the
bottom line seems to be
- If you have a format with some "natural" xml respresentation, it's a
source (Like Excel->MS's Excel-XML?)
- If you have a binary format which needs to be parsed to XML, it's a
generator (Like XLS -> Gnumeric?)
Sven
[1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=102576977207135&w=2
Andrew C. Oliver schrieb:
> Explain, elaborate.
>
> 2 Why would you want to do it at the transformation point?
>
> Sven Kuenzler wrote:
>
>> Something that just came to me thinking of the dicussion about an
>> ExcelGenerator: What about implementing it as (Writeable)Source
>> instead? That way you could use it with SourceWritingTransformer and
>> friends, not only as pipeline starting point.
>>
>> Sven
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
>> FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faq/index.html>
>>
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
> FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faq/index.html>
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faq/index.html>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
