OK Lets go to 2.1! I will give a try in it.
:) Antonio Gallardo El Martes, 03 de Septiembre de 2002 08:14, Carsten Ziegeler escribió: > Barbara Post wrote: > > Hi, I finally may use 2.1 version but need to know : are the main > > components > > in use in 2.0.3 version still stable ? New components may be less stable, > > ok. > > This is not easy to anser. Most main components are still stable in 2.1, > but some core components have changed - and most of them are stable, too. > But there seems to be some minor problems in the current caching > implementation of 2.1 - which should be fixed soon - the more people try > out 2.1, the more bugs are found, the stabler it gets. > > > What is the difference between 2.1-dev and 2.1 beta ? What's missing > > today from cvs-head ? > > There are no real plans for 2.1 beta yet. > > > What about sunRise, is it as stable as in 2.0.3 ? There is a NPE > > with 2.0.3, > > jdk 1.3.1 and sunrise-lougout action... > > I think sunRise, sunSpot and also the SourceWritingTransformer are more > stable in 2.1 than in 2.0.3. > > > Thanks a lot (I want to use SourceWritingTransformer so rather moving now > > than recompiling Cocoon-2.0.3.jar ?). And there are new > > functionalities that > > may help myself too... > > Carsten > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Please check that your question has not already been answered in the > FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faq/index.html> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please check that your question has not already been answered in the FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faq/index.html> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
